Issue - meetings

Report of the Head of Locality Services - Commissioned

Further to Minute No. 97 of the Cabinet meeting held on 9 March 2017, the Council considered the report of the Head of Locality Services - Commissioned which provided details of a number of new policies which had been developed to support the delivery of Flood and Coastal Erosion Risk Management within Sefton.  These covered issues which are relevant to the Council as Lead Local Flood Authority and are distinct from Local Plan policies for management of flood risk, surface water and coastal change in relation to the planning application process.

It was moved by Councillor Maher, seconded by Councillor Fairclough and

RESOLVED:

That approval be given to the adoption of the policies for Flood and Coastal Erosion Risk Management as set out in the report.

Report of the Head of Locality Services - Commissioned

The Cabinet considered the report of the Head of Locality Services - Commissioned which provided details of a number of new policies which had been developed to support the delivery of Flood and Coastal Erosion Risk Management within Sefton.  These covered issues which are relevant to the Council as Lead Local Flood Authority and are distinct from Local Plan policies for management of flood risk, surface water and coastal change in relation to the planning application process.

Decision Made:

That the Council be recommended to adopt the policies for Flood and Coastal Erosion Risk Management.

Reasons for Decision:

The Flood and Water Management Act 2010 recommends that the activities of the Lead Local Flood Authority (LLFA), Sefton Council, be scrutinised. These policies clarify and support the activities of the LLFA under this act. These policies will allow the LLFA to effectively prioritise demand on the service area ensuring our communities receive an effective and efficient service.

Alternative Options Considered and Rejected:

Policies not developed leading to less transparency and clarity of the service the Council delivers. This would increase the amount of unnecessary correspondence and complaints due to a lack of clarity on the position of Council in relation to flood and coastal erosion risk management. The service would be inefficient and poorly delivered as conflicting demands are made.