Venue: Committee Room, Town Hall, Bootle
Contact: Ruth Harrison Democratic Services Manager
No. | Item | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Apologies for Absence Minutes: No apologies for absence were received.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Declarations of Interest Members are requested to give notice of any disclosable pecuniary interest, which is not already included in their Register of Members' Interests and the nature of that interest, relating to any item on the agenda in accordance with the Members Code of Conduct, before leaving the meeting room during the discussion on that particular item.
Minutes:
No declarations of any disclosable pecuniary interest were received.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Minutes of the Previous Meeting PDF 92 KB Minutes of the meeting held on 7 September 2017 Minutes: Decision Made:
That the minutes of the Cabinet meeting held on 7 September 2017 be confirmed as a correct record.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Area Committees Working Group Final Report PDF 80 KB Report of the Head of Regulation and Compliance Additional documents: Minutes:
Reasons for the Decision:
The Working Group has recommended that the Overview and Scrutiny Committee (Regulatory, Compliance and Corporate Services) and the Cabinetconsider the submissions detailed in paragraph 6 and Appendix 3 of the Final Report and determine the most appropriate course of action thereon.
Alternative Options Considered and Rejected:
No alternative options were considered. The Overview and Scrutiny Committee (Regulatory, Compliance and Corporate Services) established the Working Group to review the findings of ... view the full minutes text for item 65. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Licensing/Child Sexual Exploitation Working Group Final Report PDF 75 KB Report of the Head of Regulation and Compliance Additional documents: Minutes:
Reasons for the Decision:
The Working Group has made a number of recommendations that require approval by the Overview and Scrutiny Committee (Regulatory, Compliance and Corporate Services), the Overview and Scrutiny Committee (Children’s Services and Safeguarding) and the Cabinet.
Alternative Options Considered and Rejected:
No alternative options were considered. The Overview and Scrutiny Committee (Regulatory, Compliance and Corporate Services) established the Working Group to review the topic of Licensing/Child Sexual Exploitation and the Working Group has performed this task.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Revenue and Capital Budget Update 2017/18 PDF 143 KB Report of the Head of Corporate Resources Additional documents: Minutes:
Reasons for the Decision:
To ensure that the Cabinet is informed of the forecast outturn position for the 2017/18 revenue and capital budgets as at the end of August 2017 and to provide an updated forecast of the outturn position with regard to the collection of Council Tax and Business Rates.
Alternative Options Considered and Rejected:
None
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Revenue and Capital Budget Update - Treasury Management Out-turn 2016/17 PDF 118 KB Report of the Head of Corporate Resources Minutes:
Reasons for the Decision:
To ensure that the Cabinet is fully appraised of performance against prudential indicators, and of Treasury activity undertaken in 2016/17.
Alternative Options Considered and Rejected:
None.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Parking Enforcement Contract PDF 69 KB Report of the Head of Regulation and Compliance Minutes:
Reason for the Decision:
To secure delivery of the Councils statutory responsibility to enforce parking restrictions in Sefton. The contract would also include environmental enforcement and ambassadorial duties.
Alternative Options Considered and Rejected:
The option to insource the service had been considered and discounted on the basis of the flexibility, economies of scale, expertise and cost benefits available from using an external supplier.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Purchasing of Fostering Placements for Children and Young People PDF 144 KB Report of the Head Children’s Social Care Minutes:
Reasons for the Decision:
Since April 2014, wherever possible and where no in house foster placements are available, fostering placements for children and young people have been procured through regional framework contracts.
When these regional framework contracts were originally entered into, they were entered into on the basis of a core contract period of 2 years with further optional extension periods of up to 2 years. It was anticipated at the outset that this extension would be taken up as part of the life of the contract, provided that the quality/price of services/goods provided under the contract are of a satisfactory standard and exercising the extension is considered to represent best value for the Council.
The primary purpose of building contracts around core and extension periods is to ensure that the quality of the contract is maintained throughout the life of the contract and to ensure that the Council, particularly at times of financial uncertainty has flexibility to bring contracts to a conclusion and/or is able to refine services and or goods received under the contract. . There are opportunities for new and innovative ways of procuring placements, but these have a mixed evidence base for efficacy in fostering and must be balanced against the risk of rising costs through a new tender. These include multiple authorities purchasing jointly from the DPS. A regional task and finish group was established to review the current arrangements, test alternative models and apply the learning from the residential retender to the fostering market, in order to confirm the best option from April 2018.
These are important and costly services and the alternative options to the recommendations would be likely to incur greater cost and more variable quality, hence the need to determine the manner of purchasing these placements ahead of the next financial year.
Alternative Options Considered and Rejected:
Instead of continuing to procure placements through the existing regional Framework Contracts and their replacements, the Council could carry out its own full EU compliant Tender exercise; adopt an alternative Framework, or “Spot Purchase” placements from the market as they are needed.
Undertaking a full EU compliant process alone is not recommended because: the time required to complete the process would be the same as procurement of a regional framework and in this market the Council is unlikely to obtain better prices than through collaborative procurement; and the burden and resource required to ensure quality and safety of provision would be increased, requiring additional resource. Additionally providers ... view the full minutes text for item 70. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Approval of Legal Documentation for Academy Conversions PDF 82 KB Report of the Head of Schools and Families Minutes:
Reason for the Decision:
Cabinet needs to authorise appropriate officers to enter into the agreements required as part of the academy conversion process.
Alternative Options Considered and Rejected:
There are no alternative options. The Secretary of State has the powers to direct that the academy conversion process can continue if the agreements are not signed.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Update on Regionalisation of Adoption - Adoption in Merseyside PDF 72 KB Report of the Head Children’s Social Care Minutes:
Reasons for the Decision:
In June 2015 the Department for Education (DfE) published a White Paper that proposed local authorities should create Regional Agencies by 2020 (Regionalising Adoption- June 2015). The White Paper set out an expectation that local authorities should form firm proposals, in partnership with their voluntary partners, to align adoption services into a Regional Adoption Agency (RAA). The Government commitment to this approach was developed further in the Education and Adoption Act 2016 which gave the government the power to direct a local authority to enter into a RAA if it has not done so by the end of 2017
Alternative Options Considered and Rejected:
None
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Exclusion of Press and Public
To comply with Regulation 5(2) of the Local Authorities (Executive Arrangements) (Meetings and Access to Information)(England) Regulations 2012, notice has been published regarding the intention to consider the following matter(s) in private for the reasons set out below.
No representations have been received on this matter and this agenda satisfies the requirements of Regulation 5(4).
The Cabinet is recommended to pass the following resolution:
That, under the Local Authorities (Executive Arrangements) (Meetings and Access to Information)(England) Regulations 2012, the press and public be excluded from the meeting for the following item on the grounds that it involves the likely disclosure of exempt information as defined in Paragraph 3 of Part 1 of Schedule 12A to the Local Government Act 1972. The Public Interest Test has been applied and favours exclusion of the information from the Press and Public.
Minutes: RESOLVED:
That, under the Local Authorities (Executive Arrangements) (Meetings and Access to Information)(England) Regulations 2012, the press and public be excluded from the meeting for the following items on the grounds that it involves the likely disclosure of exempt information as defined in Paragraph 3 of Part 1 of Schedule 12A to the Local Government Act 1972. The Public Interest Test has been applied and favours exclusion of the information from the Press and Public.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sefton Council Housing Development Company Report of the Head of Regeneration and Housing Minutes: The Cabinet considered the report of the Head of Regeneration and Housing in relation to Sefton Council Housing Development Company.
Decision Made:
That the recommendations contained within the report be approved..
Reason for the Decision:
To inform Cabinet of the proposals.
Alternative Options Considered and Rejected:
None.
|